© 2025 LEHIGHVALLEYNEWS.COM
Your Local News | Allentown, Bethlehem & Easton
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Lehigh Valley Politics and Election News

Deal or no deal? Where we are with the federal government shutdown and what's next

Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. John Fetterman is running for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate.
Marc Levy
/
AP
U.S. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., was one of eight senators who crossed the aisle on a procedural vote Sunday evening that could lead to the federal government reopening. He's the only Democrat who has consistently voted to fund the government over the past 40 days.

BETHLEHEM, Pa. — The end of the record-setting federal shutdown is in sight after U.S. Sen. John Fetterman and seven members of the Senate Democratic caucus joined every Republican on a procedural vote Sunday night that could lead to the government reopening.

National media outlets report the eight have negotiated a deal with the Trump administration and Senate Republicans in which federal employees who were laid off during the shutdown would be rehired.

The Trump administration laid off 4,108 employees in the first two weeks of the 40-day standoff, though a federal judge found last month the terminations likely violated union contracts.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-North Carolina, has also agreed to allow a vote on extending tax breaks on Affordable Care Act premiums, which are set to expire in the new year. However, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, hasn't made a similar promise to allow a vote on the extension in the lower chamber, outlets report.

Congressional Democrats had been withholding their support on a continuing resolution, saying the ACA tax extensions needed to be baked into any deal to reopen the government.

The five Democrats who have launched campaigns for Pennsylvania's 7th Congressional District in 2026 all expressed support for the shutdown unless the tax extensions were secured.

One of them, Pennsylvania Professional Fire Fighters Association President Bob Brooks, took to social media Monday morning to pan the deal.

Opponents of the agreement could still prolong the shutdown for days — even if the 60 supporters stick together. The Senate still needs to hold procedural votes where Democrats and fiscal hawks could drag out the process.

The Republican-controlled House would then need to pass the new version of the resolution.

U.S. Rep. Ryan Mackenzie, R-Lehigh Valley, has tried to thread the needle of keeping the government open, supporting Republican leadership and extending the ACA tax breaks. He's called Democrats irresponsible for withholding their votes to open the government while lobbying Johnson to "chart a conservative path that protects working families" by extending the cuts.

While Mackenzie, President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans have been blaming Democrats on the historic shutdown, they've made exceptions for Fetterman, D-Pa. He has been the only Democrat to consistently vote to reopen the government during the stalemate. He's been joined by Sen. Angus King of Maine, an independent who caucuses with Democrats.

The deal materialized Sunday evening, leading to abrupt changes in schedules. U.S. Sen. David McCormick, R-Pa., had been scheduled to tape WFMZ's "Business Matters" program Monday afternoon. Producers of the program notified guests and media Sunday that the taping was cancelled so McCormick could stay in Washington to vote on the legislation.

The strains of the shutdown had started to appear in full view over the past few weeks.

Since Oct. 1, approximately 700,000 non-essential government workers have been furloughed while another 700,000 or so have been required to work without pay. In the last week, the FAA has cancelled thousands of domestic flights as more and more air traffic controllers don't report to work after missing their paychecks. Flight delays are expected to linger even if the government reopens.

In addition, regular funding for SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps, ran dry Nov. 1.

When a federal judge ordered the administration to restore payments to states with reserve funding, the administration made conflicting statements before threatening repercussions to states that made full payments to beneficiaries.